RAJIV SHARMA, ALOK SINGH
Lalit Miglani – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
Rajiv Sharma, J.
On the oral prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, (1) National Mission for Clean Ganga through its Director, (2) Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, (3) Central Pollution Control Board and (4) Union of India through Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, are added as respondent nos.5, 6, 7 and 8 respectively. Registry is directed to implead those respondents in the array of parties.
2. The present petition, in the nature of public interest litigation, has been instituted by an advocate practicing in this Court. Petitioner has highlighted the pollution of river Ganga. According to the averments made in the petition, the authorities are remiss in discharge of their statutory duties. It is averred in the petition that the Uttarakhand Environment Protection and Pollution Control Board (UEPPCB) conducted a study and slotted the water of river Ganga in four categories: (a) being fit for drinking, (b) for bathing, (c) for agriculture and (d) for excessive pollution. The level of coliform bacteria in the river water is above the prescribed limit. The coliform found in the water should be below 50 mp
Dabur India Ltd. & another v. State of U.P. & another’ (1990) 4 SCC 113
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India and others
Kundori Labour Co-operative Society Ltd. v. State of Bihar
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India & others (1987) 4 SCC 463
M.C. Mehta (II) v. Union of India reported in (1988) SCC 471
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar & others’ reported in (1991) 1 SCC 598
Virender Gaur & others v. State of Haryana and others’ (1995) 2 SCC 577
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.