K.M. JOSEPH, C.J.

These two appeals being connected, we dispose of the same by this common judgment.

2. These appeals relate to the service conditions of the employees of the Wild Life Institute of India (from hereinafter referred to as “the Institute”). Appellants in Special Appeal No. 348 of 2015 are respondent nos. 10, 11 and 7 respectively in the writ petition. Appellant in Special Appeal No. 338 of 2015 is respondent no. 6 in the Writ Petition. The first respondent in Special Appeal No. 348 of 2015 is the writ petitioner and will be referred to as such.

3. The writ petitioner approached this Court seeking the following two reliefs in the writ petition :

“1. Issue writ Issue writ rule or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 8.11.2011 along with its effect and operation also after calling the entire records from the respondents and further to declare the condition provide in the service rules 2007 to treat the presently working as Hindi translator for promotion in the feeding cadre is unconstitutional and ultra virus to the Constitu