SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(UK) 673

U.C.DHYANI
Surender Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. C.S. Rawat
For the Respondents: Mr. K.S. Rawal

JUDGMENT :

U.C. Dhyani, J.

By means of present criminal writ petition, the petitioners seek following reliefs, among others:-

i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the FIR dated 22.03.2015, lodged by respondent no. 3, registered as case crime no. 40 of 2015, under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, relating to P.S. Cantt., District Dehradun.

ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the respondent no. 2 not to arrest and harass the petitioners in connection with aforesaid case crime, till the pendency of the present writ petition.

2. When the matter was taken up for admission on 08.05.2015, interim protection from arrest was granted to the petitioners in connection with case crime no. 40 of 2015, under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act, relating to P.S. Cantt., District Dehradun.

3. Notice was issued to respondent no. 3, but none has appeared on her behalf.

4. Learned Brief Holder submitted that the investigation of the case is under progress and it will take sometime to complete the same.

5. Learned counsel for the parties proposed that the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top