U.C.DHYANI
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
U.C. Dhyani, J.
By means of present writ petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs, among others:
“(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing and setting aside the impugned FIR dated 11.11.2016 (contained as Annexure -1) registered as Case Crime No. 65 of 2016, under Section 308 of IPC, P.S. Khanpur, District Haridwar.
(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in Case Crime No. 65 of 2016, under Section 308 of IPC, P.S. Khanpur, District Haridwar till the pendency of present petition.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the private respondents, perused the documents brought on record and considered the grounds taken up in the writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the both the parties stated that the parties have buried their differences and have settled their disputes amicably. Injured Vipul is minor. His father Mangeram (respondent no. 3) who is lodgeder of the FIR/complainant, is present is present in person, duly identified by his counsel Mr. B. M. Pingal, Advocate. He says that he h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.