K. M. Joseph, J.

1. All the appeals raise similar issues, hence, we are disposing of the same by this common judgment.

2. In Special Appeal No. 210 of 2017, appellants who were respondents no. 1, 2 and 3 in writ petition, have called in question the original judgment delivered by learned Single Judge and also the order passed in Review/Recall Application. Other appeals are only directed against original judgment. It appears that no other review petition was filed.

3. All the writ petitioners were appointed as Secretary of the Primary Agriculture Cooperative Credit Societies (hereinafter referred to as “PACS”) in the State of Uttarakhand. On retirement, on not being paid leave encashment, gratuity, benefit of ACP, and difference between 5th and 6th Pay Commission, writ petitions came to be filed. The persons who are arrayed as respondents in the writ petitions are as follows:

“1. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Cooperative Societies, Government of Uttarakhand, Civil Secretariat, Dehradun.

2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Government of Uttarakhand, Lower Mall Ro