IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Mohan Singh - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand - Respondent
Criminal Jail Appeal No. 07 of 2014
Decided On : 09-11-2017
IPC - Criminal Appeal - Sections 307/450/506, Section 4/25 of the Arms Act - The judgment discusses the conviction of the accused under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Arms Act, based on the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and the nature of injuries sustained by the victim.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted under Sections 307/450/506 of the IPC and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act for assaulting a 12-year-old child with a knife, resulting in 18 injuries. The incident occurred when the child was alone at home, and the accused, under the influence of liquor, entered the house and assaulted the child.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the accused guilty based on the testimony of the injured witness, corroborated by other witnesses, and the medical report detailing the injuries sustained by the victim.
Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of the witnesses, the nature of injuries, and the intent of the accused in committing the assault.
Ratio Decidendi: The crucial testimony of the injured witness, supported by other witnesses and medical evidence, left no room for doubt regarding the prosecution's case, leading to the affirmation of the conviction.
Final Decision: The criminal jail appeal was dismissed, and the appellant's conviction and sentence were upheld.
This criminal jail appeal is received through the Superintendent, Sub-Jail, Haldwani, District Nainital, where the appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 04.01.2014, passed by the 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nainital in Session Trial No. 30 of 2013 (State Vs. Mohan Singh), in which the accused/appellant has been convicted under Sections 307/450/506 of the Indian Penal Code (from hereinafter referred to as the “IPC”) and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act, and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 307 of IPC for a period of seven years with a fine of Rs.7,000/- and six months additional simple imprisonment in case of default in payment of fine. For the offence under Section 450 of IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo three years of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.5,000/- and five months additional simple imprisonment in case of default in payment of fine. For the offence under Section 506 of IPC, he has been sentenced to undergo one year of simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.2,000/- and two months additional simple imprisonment in case of default in payment of fine. The appellant has further been sentenced for the offence under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act for one year of simple imprisonment with a fine of Rs.1,000/- and one month additional simple imprisonment in case of default of payment of fine. All the sentences are directed to be run concurrently. The appellant is in jail.
2. As per the prosecution, the accused entered the house of the complainant Harish Chand Arya at about 12:45 P.M. in the afternoon when his 12 years old son Manoj Kumar Arya was alone in the house. It has also come in the evidence that the accused at the relevant time was carrying a knife and was under influence of liquor. The appellant dragged the son of the complainant inside the house and assaulted him many times with the knife he was carrying, as a result of which, this 12 years old child sustained as many as 18 injuries, mainly on his head but also on his palm, hands and other places. He lost his conscious and it was only when his mother reached the house that he could be taken to the hospital and given medical aid, as a result of which he survived. The incident is of 30.11.2012. Since the child was being hospitalized and was in ICU of a private Nursing Home, namely, Krishna Nursing Home, the parents could not lodge the FIR immediately and understandably, therefore, the FIR was lodged next date i.e. on 01.12.2012 at 1500 hours in the afternoon under Sections 307/450 and 506 of IPC and thereafter in the investigation when it is known that the accused belongs to a higher caste and the victim belongs to the Scheduled Caste, offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was also added along with Section 4/25 of the Arms Act.
3. The accused was arrested 10 days later on 11.12.2012 and on his pointing out, the weapon of offence which is a knife was recovered on the same day. Subsequently, after investigation, the police filed the charge-sheet and the matter was committed to the Session Court and thereafter charges were framed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nainital on 21.03.2013 under Sections 307/450/506 of IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
4. The prosecution in order to establish its case examined as many as 11 witnesses. The injured witness who is 12 years old boy i.e. Manoj kumar Arya was examined on 08.08.2013 as PW-5. In his examination-in-chief, he states that on the date of the incident, he was alone in his house as his mother and father had gone out for work. The accused who is known to the victim and whom he calls “uncle”, came to his house and started inquiring about his mother and thereafter about his father. The witness states that the accused was in a very aggressive mood and was also under influen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.