SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(UK) 337

RAJIV SHARMA, SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Dinesh Singh Rawat – Appellant
Versus
Anita Rawat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Siddhartha Shah, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

This is husband’s appeal seeking setting aside the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2014, passed by the learned family Court, Pauri Garhwal, whereby his Suit under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (i-b) on the ground of cruelty and desertion has been rejected.

2. Brief facts of the case resulting to the filing of the Suit was that the appellant contended that he was married with the respondent in accordance with Hindu rites and rituals on 08.10.2000. The marriage thus solemnized between them was conducted in a very simple way and there was no exchange of dowry of any nature and thereafter both husband and wife lived peacefully and enjoyed their matrimonial life without there being any misunderstanding for feud of any nature.

3. Out of the wedlock, two children were born, namely Swayanka, daughter and Swarakya Rawat, son who at the time of institution of the proceedings under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act were of 10 years and 9 years of age respectively.

4. According to the husband at the time when the marriage was solemnized, he was working with the Govt. Department and thereafter two years of marriage, the wife too got an employment in the Education Depar








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top