RAJIV SHARMA, SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
Chainpal – Respondent
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
The wife has challenged the judgment dated 21.11.2015 by virtue of which the learned Family Court, Laksar, District Haridwar had allowed the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, preferred by the plaintiff-respondent, the husband, whereby a Suit under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of marriage dated 11.03.2008, as solemnized between the parties at village Nanhera, District Jyotiba Fulenagar has been decreed consequently the marriage between them has been dissolved.
2. The appellant-wife in the appeal, based on the grounds which has been taken by her for challenging the impugned judgment dated 21.11.2015, passed in Case No. 195 of 2012 “Chainpal Vs. Smt. Sunita”, are that she was married with the plaintiff-respondent on 11.03.2008 and out of the wedlock, a son was born, who at the time of institution of the proceedings for dissolution of marriage was living with her.
3. She submitted that though she was severely tortured and harassed by the respondent-husband and even to the extent that she was ousted from the matrimonial home. Despite of it, the respondent-husband, to give colours to his allegations has instituted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.