SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(UK) 410

V.K.BIST
Dinesh Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Hemant Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vivek Pathak, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Government Advocate and Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.

2. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing the impugned First Information Report No.032 dated 10.03.2017 under Sections 167, 218, 219, 409, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 474, 120-B & 34 of I.P.C. registered at ROP SIDCUL, P.S. Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. Further prayer has been made in the writ petition for direction to respondent no.2 not to arrest and not to harass the petitioner in pursuance of First Information Report No.032 dated 10.03.2017 under Sections 167, 218, 219, 409, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 474, 120-B & 34 of I.P.C. registered at ROP SIDCUL, P.S. Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar.

3. Initially, the matter was heard on 13.10.2017 and after hearing learned counsel for the parties, the following order was passed:-

“Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Admit.

Issue notice to respondent no.3 returnable at any early date, by registered post, acknowledgment due.

L












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top