SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(UK) 546

SUDHANSHU DHULIA
MOON TOURS AND TRAVELS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate
For the State : Mr. R.P. Sharma, Learned Brief Holder
For the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3:Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)

1. This petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the cancellation of technical bid which petitioners had offered pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Nagar Palika Parishad, Nainital for Zoo Shuttle Services for ferrying the passengers from two pre-determined points from Mall Road, Nainital to the Zoo i.e. the destination.

2. The advertisement to this effect was published by Nagar Palika Parishad, Nainital in one daily newspaper namely, Amar Ujala, on 03.05.2015. As per the terms of the advertisement, it was a two-bid process;

a. Technical bid,

b. Financial bid.

3. Further it has been stated that as a bid security or as an earnest money, as it is called, the applicants were to deposit an amount of Rs.50,000/- in the form of FDR alongwith “bid documents”. It was further directed that the applicants shall submit both the bids i.e. Technical and Financial both, in separate envelopes, clearly superscripted over the said envelope and thereafter, to keep both the said envelopes in a single bigger envelope. Ho



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top