U.C. Dhyani, J.(Oral)

Since identical issue of law is involved in the aforementioned writ petitions, therefore, they are being decided together by this common judgment and order for the sake of brevity and convenience, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

2. By means of aforesaid writ petitions, petitioner/plaintiff Sanjay Verma, seeks following reliefs, among others:

i) to quash the order dated 12.05.2015 passed by learned Addl. District Judge IV, Dehradun in M.C.A. no. 57 of 2014, Om Sai Infra Promoters Pvt. Ltd. and another vs Sanjay Verma and others as also in M.C.A. no. 115 of 2014, Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad vs Sanjay Verma and others, and further to allow the temporary injunction filed by the petitioner / plaintiff and further directing the parties to maintain status quo over the property in question.

3. A suit for permanent prohibitory injunction, cancellation of sale deed and partition was filed by the plaintiff/petitioner against the defendants/respondents. An application for temporary injunction (paper no. 6C) was filed. The defendants/respondents filed objections (paper no. 58C2) against the same. The trial court after hearing