V.K.BIST
Narendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
V.K. Bist, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This Criminal Revision is directed against the judgment and order 09.05.2017 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tehri Garhwal, in Sessions Trial No. 16 of 2016 “State Vs. Narendra Singh”, by which the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tehri Garhwal found that there are sufficient ground for framing charge against the revisionist under Section 306 I.P.C. and framed charge against the revisionist under Section 306 I.P.C.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the lower court’s record.
4. Facts, in brief, are that, on 18.03.2016, complainant Mastan Singh lodged an F.I.R. in Police Station Kirtinagar, Tehri Garhwal stating therein that, on that day, his brother Dhirendra was alone at his home. The complainant had gone to Srinagar for some work. His mother, his wife and wife of Dhirendra had gone to the forest to fetch the wood. When they came back at around 01:00-02:00 p.m., the wife of Dhirendra went to open the door of her room, which was closed from inside. She knocked the door and asked to open the door. When the door was not opened, she saw from the skylight that her hu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.