SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(UK) 127

SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Jeet Pal – Appellant
Versus
State Information Commissioner, Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner before this Court was In-charge Headmaster of a Government Primary School, Tanda Banhera, Tehsil Roorkee. On information sought by one Munir/respondent no. 2 under the Right to Information Act (from hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), an enquiry was set up by the District Education Officer (Primary) and in the enquiry, it came out that the present petitioner, who was at the relevant time In-charge Headmaster in Government Primary School, Tanda Banhera, was collecting Rs.200/- from each student which is not authorized under the law. Further, it has also come out that an anomaly had been done i.e. misappropriation of funds in Mid-Day Meal Scheme. On this, a second appeal was filed before the State Information Commissioner, Uttarakhand and the State Information Commissioner came to the conclusion that this matter needs to be inquired into as the matter relates to corruption and misappropriation of funds etc, and therefore, the State Information Commissioner had directed the District Magistrate, Haridwar to enquire into the matter vide order dated 19.12.2017. This order is presently being challenged by the petitioner before this Court by means of the pres
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top