SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(UK) 156

RAJIV SHARMA, ALOK SINGH
Rupendra @ Bhupendra @ Saunthiya – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. R.C. Tamta
For the Respondents: Mr. Amit Bhatt

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.

This appeal is instituted against the judgment and order dated 07.12.2016, rendered by learned Sessions Judge, Uttarkashi, in Sessions Trial No. 06 of 2014, whereby the appellant was charged with and tried for the offences under Section 302 read with Section 201 IPC. The appellant was convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment under Section 302 and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo additional six months rigorous imprisonment. The appellant was further convicted and sentenced to undergo seven years’ rigorous imprisonment under Section 201 IPC and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo additional two months’ rigorous imprisonment. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is that on 17.03.2014 one Sri Kapoor Chand has informed the police on mobile that a body was lying in a field. Thereafter, S.H.O. J.P. Kukreti, S.I. Mahadev Uniyal along with other constables went to the spot. The dead body was seen in the mustard field. Thereafter, the brother of the deceased also lodged a report. The dead body was sent for postmortem



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top