K.M.JOSEPH, ALOK SINGH
Surendra Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Chief Information Commissioner – Respondent
K.M. Joseph, J.
1. Appellant is the writ petitioner. The writ petition was filed calling in question order dated 13.08.2013 passed by the second respondent State Information Commissioner.
2. Brief facts, as set out in the writ petition, appears to be as follows:
By Annexure No. 1 dated 14.01.2013, Annexure No. 2 dated 18.02.2013 and Annexure No. 3 dated 16.03.2013, appellant, who claims to be a President of an organization, had sought information from the third respondent. Pursuant to Annexure No. 1, Annexure No. 4 information was provided. Being dissatisfied, appellant filed Annexure No. 5 appeal before the first appellate authority. Annexure No. 6 purports to be an order passed by the first appellate authority. Appellant filed Annexure No. 7 second appeal. He also moved Annexure No. 8 application. Annexure No. 10 purports to be the information provided pursuant to Annexure No. 2 application. Being dissatisfied, appellant filed Annexure No. 11 appeal. Annexure No. 12 is the order passed on Annexure No. 11 appeal. Thereupon, appellant filed Annexure No. 13 second appeal. Annexure No. 14 purports to be the information supplied pursuant to Annexure No. 3 application. Against t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.