SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(UK) 232

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Rajiv Sharma, Lok Pal Singh, JJ.
Kamal Gupta - Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others - Respondents
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 87 of 2014
Decided On : 11-07-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Mr. Devang Dobhal
For the State : Mr. Pradeep Joshi

The central legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the State to provide free and compulsory education to children with special needs, including the appointment of Special Educators, making school premises barrier-free, and ensuring access to education and scholarships.

Headnote:

Right to Education - Children with Special Needs - The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - The judgment discusses the difficulties faced by Children with Special needs for pursuing education in the State of Uttarakhand. It highlights the relevant provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, emphasizing the rights and provisions for children with disabilities. The court's decision mandates the appointment of Special Educators, making school premises barrier-free, setting up special teachers' training institutions, providing care and monetary incentives to parents/guardians of children with special needs, and ensuring access to education and scholarships for children with special needs.

Fact of the Case:

The Court took cognizance of the difficulties faced by Children with Special needs for pursuing education in Uttarakhand. The Parliament has enacted the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, and the State of Uttarakhand has framed rules under this Act. The petitioner provided a list of children with special needs in the State of Uttarakhand. The respondents filed counter affidavits detailing the steps taken to provide education and support to children with special needs.

Finding of the Court:

The steps taken by the respondents were found to be inadequate and not in line with the relevant Acts and Rules. The court found that children with special needs have been included in the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and the Rules framed by the State of Uttarakhand. The court emphasized the need for appointing Special Educators, making school premises barrier-free, setting up special teachers' training institutions, providing care and monetary incentives to parents/guardians of children with special needs, and ensuring access to education and scholarships for children with special needs.

Issues: The main issue was the inadequate steps taken by the respondents to provide education and support to children with special needs, which were found to be not in line with the relevant Acts and Rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision emphasized the need for appointing Special Educators, making school premises barrier-free, setting up special teachers' training institutions, providing care and monetary incentives to parents/guardians of children with special needs, and ensuring access to education and scholarships for children with special needs.

Final Decision: The court issued mandatory directions to the State Government, educational institutions, and authorities to ensure the appointment of Special Educators, make school premises barrier-free, set up special teachers' training institutions, provide care and monetary incentives to parents/guardians of children with special needs, and ensure access to education and scholarships for children with special needs.

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.

1. The Court has taken cognizance of letter dated 22.04.2014 written by Shri Kamal Gupta highlighting therein the difficulties faced by Children with Special needs for pursuing education in the Educational Institutions throughout the State of Uttarakhand.

2. Article 21-A of the Constitution of India was inserted in the Constitution by way of 86th amendment Act, 2002 w.e.f. 01.04.2010, it reads as under :-

“21-A. Right to education- The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years in such manner as the State may, by law, determine.”

3. The parliament has enacted the Act called “The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009”. The Statement of Object and reasons reads as under :-

“The crucial role of universal elementary education for strengthening the social fabric of democracy through provision of equal opportunities to all has been accepted since inception of our Republic. The Directive Principles of State Policy enumerated in our Constitution lays down that the State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children up to the age of fourteen years. Over the years there has been significant spatial and numerical expansion of elementary schools in the country, yet the goal of universal elementary education continues to elude us. The number of children, particularly children from disadvantaged groups and weaker sections, who drop out of school before completing elementary education, remains very large. Moreover, the quality of learning achievement is not always entirely satisfactory even in the case of children who complete elementary education.

2. Article 21-A, as inserted by the Constitution (Eight-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002, provides for free and compulsory education to all children in the age group of six to fourteen years as a Fundamental Right in such manner as the State may, be law, determine.

4. Section 2 (d) defines “child belonging to disadvantaged group”. “Child belonging to weaker section” has been defined under Section 2(e). Section 2(ee) defines “child with disability”, it reads as under :-

(A) a child with “disability” as defined in clause (i) of Section 2 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (1 of 1996);

(B) a child, being a person with disability as defined in clause (j) of Section 2 of the National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999 (44 of 1999);

(C) a child with “severe disability” as defined in clause (o) of Section 2 of the National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999 (44 of 1999);

5. “School” has been defined under Section 2(n). The Section 3 provides that the every child of the age of six to fourteen years, including a child referred to in clause (d) or clause (e) of Section 2, shall have the right to free and compulsory education in a neighbourhood school till the completion of his or her elementary education. The Sub Section 3 of Section 3 reads as under :-

3. Right of child to free and compulsory education-

(1)…..

(2)…..

(3) A child with disability referred to in sub-clause (A) of clause (ee) of Section 2 shall, without prejudice to the provision of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (1 of 1996), and a child referred to in sub-clauses (B) and (C) of clause (ee) of Section 2 have the same rights to pursue free and compulsory elementary education which children with disabilities have under the provisions of Chapter V of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995;

Provided that a child with “multiple disabilities” referred to in clause (h) and a child with “severe disability” referred to in clause (o) of Section 2 of the National Trust for Welfare of Per













































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top