LOK PAL SINGH
Akshay Sonwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
Lok Pal Singh, J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioners have been summoned to face the trial for the offences punishable under section 307, 504 and 506 IPC.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned counsel for the complainant stated before this Court that parties have entered into compromise. It is further submitted that all the offences except 307 IPC, are compoundable in nature. It is further submitted that from a bare perusal of the FIR, ingredients of the offence punishable under section 307 IPC, are not made out against the applicants. Furthermore, a perusal of the medical report would reveal that the injury sustained by the injured (respondent no. 2) is not on the vital part, which could prove fatal for his life.
4. A compounding application, being CLMA No. 791 of 2018, has been moved on behalf of the applicant. Said application is accompanied with the affidavits of Akshay Sonwal (petitioner no. 1) as well as of the complainant-respondent no. 2 and injured respondent no. 3.
5. Both the petitioners are present in person before the Court, duly identified by their counsel Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate. Injured- Jitendra Kanojia (complainant) is also pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.