SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Tarabuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
By virtue of the impugned order under challenge in the Writ Petition i.e. dated 10.10.2017, there happens to be a denial of the payment of the benefit of the 3rd ACP, which the petitioner contends that he was otherwise entitled to receive in view of the implications as contained in the Government Order No. 872/XXVII/(7)/2011 dated 08.03.2011, which has been denied by the impugned order, based upon the fact of taking into consideration the previous adverse entries which already stood expunged.
2. Briefly put the facts of the petitioner are that the petitioner was appointed as a regular Conductor with the respondent-Transport Corporation, as back as, on 01.05.1989. Petitioner supports his case for the grant of benefits of 3rd ACP based on the Government order dated 08.03.2011. The Government Order dated 08.03.2011 was later on awarded by G.O. 589/xxvii(7)40(ix) 2011 dated 11.07.2013, which was ensuring the entitlement of employee to receive benefits enforced w.e.f. 01.01.2006, to that extent it awarded the G.O. dated 01.07.2013. The Government order dated 01.07.2013 (Annexure No. 1 to the Writ Petition), which in its paragraph-2 sub para-1 provides for the payment of the ben
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.