Per Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

These are two appeals, being First Appeal No. 13 of 2016, Smt. Seema Vs. Shiv Singh Negi and First Appeal No. 14 of 2016, Smt. Seema Vs. Shiv Singh Negi.

2. In the former appeal, the appellant wife has challenged the judgment dated 16.12.2015, whereby, the Family Court has decreed the Suit, being Suit No. 118 of 2013, filed by the respondent Shiv Singh Negi, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of marriage.

3. While, in the connected Appeal, being First Appeal No. 14 of 2016, filed by the wife, challenges have been given by the appellant wife to the judgment dated 17th December, 2015, whereby her Original Application No. 91 of 2011, Smt. Seema Vs. Shiv Singh Negi under Section 9 has been rejected.

4. The factual backdrop in both the appeals are identical, hence, for the purposes of brevity, these appeals are being decided together.

5. The case of the appellant wife in the appeals is that she was married with the respondent in accordance with the Hindu rites and rituals on 19th April, 2000, and out of the wedlock, a son Anshul was born who has been forcefully kept by the wife. Primarily, the divorce petition was file