U.C.DHYANI
NASEEM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
U.C. Dhyani, J. (Oral)
By means of present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicants seek to quash/set aside the order dated 22.03.2014, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar, as also entire proceedings of complaint case no. 85/2014, under Section 386 IPC, pending before Judicial Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar.
2. Complainant instituted a criminal complaint case against the accused. During the pendency of said criminal complaint, at the stage of Section 244 Cr.P.C., complainant died. Complainant’s son sought permission to prosecute the accused, which was allowed by the trial court vide order dated 22.03.2014. Hence present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
3. Hon’ble Apex Court in Ashwin Nanubhai Vyas vs State of Maharashtra and another, AIR 1967 SC 983, in a similar controversy has held that there is no provision in Code of Criminal Procedure or Chapter 18 thereof about acquittal or discharge of accused on failure of complainant to attend, which is deliberate departure from Chapters on trial of summons and warrant cases, and Magistrate should proceed with committal enquiry although complainant is absent. Bar of Section
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.