U.C.DHYANI
SUBHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
U.C. Dhyani, J. (Oral)
1. By means of present Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant seeks to quash the entire proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 214 of 2016 (Case Crime No. 91 of 2016), State vs. Subhan, under Sections 307, 504 & 506 I.P.C., pending before the learned Sessions Judge, District Haridwar.
2. An affidavit has been filed by respondent no. 3 Atiqurraheman and the applicant’s brother Sahejama @ Sahjama [petitioner/applicant is in jail] to show that the parties have buried their differences and have settled their disputes amicably. Sahejama (brother of the applicant) is present in person duly identified by his counsel Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, Advocate. Respondents no. 2 to 5 are also present in person, duly identified by their counsel Mr. Sunil Chandra, Advocate. Private respondents including Alishan (respondent no. 5/minor) submitted that parties have settled their disputes amicably and now they have no grievance left against the applicant. Respondents further submitted that they have no objection if the criminal proceedings initiated by them against the applicant are quashed on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties.
3. Where
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.