SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(UK) 570

U.C.DHYANI
PRASHANT PANDA – Appellant
Versus
VEDPAL SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Applicant :Mr. Shashi Kant Shandila, Advocate

JUDGMENT

U.C. Dhyani, J. (Oral)

1. By means of present Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant seeks to quash the summoning order dated 28.03.2016 as well as the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 125 of 2016, Vedpal vs. Prashant Panda, under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC, pending in the Court of Additional Judicial Magistrate, Laksar, District Haridwar.

2. The sole respondent field a criminal complaint case against the accused-applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. The trial court recorded the statement of the complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. The statements of Pradeep and Mukesh were recorded under Section 202 Cr.P.C. The documents were filed by the complainant. After considering the material on record, the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Laksar summoned the accused-applicant to face the trial for the offences under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC. Against the summoning order, applicant filed a Revision, which too was dismissed. Hence the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

3. According to the complainant, accused took a sum of Rs. 20,80,000/- from the complainant by Cheque No. 00793879 on 23.10.2017. The



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top