SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Jiwan Chandra Sanwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
1. The petitioner has filed a review petition seeking review of the judgment dated 14.05.2018. The same is accompanied with a delay condonation application where Registry has reported that there happens to be a delay of 212 days. The delay condonation application is not being seriously opposed by the Standing Counsel and rather parties agreed to address themselves on merits of the review. Consequently, the delay condonation application is allowed and the delay which has chanced in filing the review application would stand condoned.
2. With the consent of the parties the review application itself is being considered on merits. The petitioner had filed a writ petition praying for the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned Govt. order dated 29.06.2006 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition) passed by respondent no….
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order passed by the respondent by which order deduction from the salary of petitioner (annexure no. 6 to the writ petition).
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.