SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Prakesh Singh Papola – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
1. The present Revision has been preferred by the revisionist assailing the judgment and order dated 01-04-2008 of conviction as passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Bageshwar in Criminal Case No. 440 of 2007, State Vs. Prakash Singh Papola, under Sections 279 and 304-A of I.P.C. The revisionist has been convicted to undergo a sentence of six months simple imprisonment for commission of an offence under Section 279 IPC with a fine of Rs.1000/-was imposed and for commission of an offence under Section 304-A IPC, the revisionist was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year with a penalty of Rs.5000/-. Both the sentences were to run concurrently and on failure to deposit penalty, the revisionist was sentenced to further undergo an imprisonment of 30 days for offence under Section 279 IPC and 60 days for offence under Section 304-A of I.P.C.
2. The revisionist being aggrieved against the judgment as rendered by the Trial Court on 01.04.2008 in Criminal Case No. 440 of 2007, State Vs. Prakash Singh Papola had preferred a Criminal Appeal No. 8 of 2008, Prakash Singh Papola Vs. State of Uttarakhand. The Appellate Court too by the judgment dated 26.10.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.