RAMESH RANGANATHAN, R.C.KHULBE
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Electronic – Respondent
Ramesh Ranganathan, J.
This appeal is preferred against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in ITA No.1994/Del./2015 dated 10.09.2018. Aggrieved by the said order, the Revenue has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act.
2. The respondent-assessee claims to have purchased goods worth Rs.73,91,587/- in Faridabad for his business activities at Haridwar. Holding that these purchases had not been made, the claim of the respondent-assessee for deduction of Rs.73,91,587 was disallowed, and the respondent-assessee was subjected to tax under the Income Tax Act on the resultant enhanced profit from business.
3. The assessee carried the mater in appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) who deleted the additions made by the Assessing Officer, allowing them the benefit, under Section 80IC of the Income Tax Act, on the entire eligible income. Aggrieved thereby, the Revenue carried the matter in appeal to the Tribunal.
4. In the order under appeal, the Tribunal observed that the assessee-unit was eligible for deduction u/s 80IC; it was not in dispute that the assessee was entitled to the benefit of Section 80IC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.