SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Salekh Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
1. The present Criminal Revision arises out of judgments of conviction, whereby, the present revisionists have been convicted for commission of the offences under Section 323 and 427 of IPC. By virtue of the judgment of conviction dated 13.08.2008, impugned in the Revision, each convict has been sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment each and a fine of Rs.200/- each has been imposed for the offences under Sections 323 and for 427 of IPC by the Judicial Magistrate, Laksar, District Haridwar. Both the sentences were to run concurrently. It was further directed that in an event if the accused revisionists fail to deposit the fine thus imposed by the conviction order, they will have to undergo, a further sentence of simple imprisonment for a period of one month each. This judgment of conviction of Trial Court dated 13.08.2008 was challenged in Criminal Appeal No. 49 of 2008, Salekh Chand and others Vs. State and others. The Appellate Court vide its impugned judgment dated 18.12.2010, had dismissed the Criminal Appeal and confirmed the sentence as imposed by the Trial Court.
2. Before coming to any logical conclusion, it becomes necessary for this Court to deal wit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.