UMESH CHANDRA DHYANI
Mamraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
General Manager, (Panda), B. H. E. L. – Respondent
Umesh Chandra Dhyani, J
Present Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved against the judgment and decree dated 25.02.2015, passed by learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Haridwar, in Civil Appeal No. 23 of 2008 (General Manager v. Mamraj Singh), whereby the suit of the plaintiff/appellant has been dismissed and judgment & decree dated 19.09.2008, passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)/1st FTC, Haridwar in Original Suit No. 141 of 1997 (Mamraj v. General Manager and others) has been set aside. Plaintiff/appellant filed a suit against the defendant/respondents for realizing a sum of Rs. 28,948.79/- in the Court of Civil Judge (S.D.), Haridwar. The learned Civil Judge (S.D.), Haridwar, vide judgment and decree dated 19.09.2008, decreed the suit of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was directed to pay Rs. 15,266.79/- along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The defendant was also directed to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till realization of the money. Aggrieved against the same, the defendant preferred a Civil Appeal No. 23 of 2008, which was allowed by learned 3rd Additional District J
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.