IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Ramesh Ranganathan, Alok Kumar Verma, JJ.
Kumaon Institute Of Education And Technology – Appellant
Versus
Uttarakhand Open University And Another – Respondents
Special Appeal No. 899 of 2019
Decided On : 02-11-2019
Regulation 14 - University Grants Commission Act - Section 26(1), Section 12(j) - 2017 Regulations - Learner Support Centre - Regulation 14(1) - Section 26(3) - Higher Educational Institution - Regulation 2(k)
Fact of the Case:
The appellant-writ petitioner sought to quash an order requiring proof of affiliation to a University as per the 2017 Regulations. The court analyzed the retrospective effect of the regulations and the obligations on the Higher Educational Institution and the appellant-writ petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the 2017 Regulations did not have retrospective application and the obligation to establish a Learner Support Centre was prospective, not affecting the appellant-writ petitioner's rights prejudicially.
Issues: The issues involved the retrospective application of the 2017 Regulations and the obligation to establish a Learner Support Centre.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the 2017 Regulations did not have retrospective application and the obligation to establish a Learner Support Centre was prospective, not affecting the appellant-writ petitioner's rights prejudicially.
Final Decision: The Special Appeal was dismissed, and the court clarified that any student aggrieved by the regulations could avail legal remedies.
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Ranganathan, J.
Heard Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the appellant-writ petitioner, Mr. Yogesh Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent-University and Mr. Vikas Pande, learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent-UGC and, with their consent, the Special Appeal is disposed of at the stage of admission.
2. This Special Appeal is preferred against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1573 of 2019 dated 21.08.2019. The appellant-writ petitioner herein filed Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1573 of 2019 seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the order passed by the first respondent dated 24.01.2019; a writ of certiorari to quash Regulation 14(1) of the University Grants Commission (Open and Distance Learning) Regulations, 2017 (the "2017 Regulations" for short) in so far as it mandates Study Centres to take affiliation from a University; and a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to permit the appellant-institution to continue with the Study Centre, for distance education, for academic session 2019-20.
3. The appellant-writ petitioner claims to have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the first respondent-University to provide certain facilities for students undergoing distance education from the respondent-University. While the appellant-writ petitioner claims that the said MOU has been renewed periodically, no reference has been made to any such MOU in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition. Be that as it may, the University Grants Commission (for short the "UGC") made the 2017 Regulations in the exercise of its powers under Section 26(1) read with Section 12(j) of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 (for short the "UGC Act"). The 2017 Regulations came into force, on its publication in the official gazette (The Gazette of India : Extraordinary), on 23.06.2017.
4. Regulation 14 of the 2017 Regulations relates to Learner Support Centre and reads thus :-
Provided that a Higher Educational Institution may establish a special Learner Support Centre for imparting instruction to persons referred to in the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, the National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disability Act, 1999 and other persons in difficult circumstances, including jail inmates:
Provided further that a Learner Support Centre shall not be set up under a franchisee agreement in any case.
(2) A Learner Support Centre shall be the contact point or centre managed by the Higher Educational Institution for providing academic as well as administrative support to its learners, and shall perform such other functions as specified in Annexure X.
(3) The Learner Support Centre shall be headed by a Coordinator who shall be a regular teacher not below the rank of a qualified Assistant Professor of the concerned College or Higher Educational Institution and assisted by the counselors as decided by the Higher Educational Institution.
(4) The Higher Educational Institution shall have a Standard Operating Procedure for the smooth functioning of the Learner Support Centre which shall include functions of the Learner Support Centres and its different functionaries, monitoring mechanism of different services provided by the Centre, and it shall be mandatory for the Learner Support Centre to maintain the learner data related to conduct of counseling sessions, evaluation of assignments and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.