JUDGMENT :

Ramesh Ranganathan, J.

A preliminary objection is raised by Mr. M.S. Tyagi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, that, in the absence of an application seeking condonation of the delay in filing the Review Application, this Court would not be justified in examining the Review Application on its merits. Mr. B.P. Nautiyal, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the review applicants, would submit that there is no delay in filing the Review Application and the contention, urged on behalf of the respondent-writ petitioner that there is a delay of 01 day in preferring the Review Application, is not tenable.

2. The order under review was passed on 01.04.2019, and the application, to be furnished a certified copy of the said order was made on 24.04.2019. The certified copy, of the order under review, was prepared on 06.05.2019 and the Review Application was filed on 14.05.2019. The submission of Mr. M.S. Tyagi, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, is that the 30 days limitation period, for preferring a Review Application, should be computed as (i) 23 days between 01.04.2019 and 24.04.2019 excluding 01.04.2019; and (ii) 08 days from the date on