2020 Supreme(UK) 196
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Ramesh Ranganathan, R.C. Khulbe, JJ.
In The Matter Of, To Stop The Illegal Functioning Of Private Schools In District Nainital And Their Act Of Hiking Fee And Other Expenses Arbitrarily Etc - Appellant
Versus
Director General School Education And Another - Respondent
Writ Petition (Pil) No. 13 of 2020
Decided On : 01-07-2020
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the State Government to ensure free and compulsory education, protect children's rights, and constitute a State Advisory Council for the better management of the education system.
Headnote:
PIL - Education - Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (2009 Act), Section 28, Section 32, Section 34 - The court discussed the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, including the right to free and compulsory education, protection of children's rights, and the duty of the State Government to constitute a State Advisory Council. The court emphasized the importance of quality education and the State Government's duty to comply with the provisions of the Act and issued directions for the better management of the education system.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a PIL seeking the constitution of a Complaint Center to address arbitrary functioning of private schools in District Nainital and to direct private schools to fix tuition fees and other charges after consulting parent-teacher associations. The petitioner alleged exorbitant fees, compulsory purchases from specific shops, increased transportation charges, and the compulsion of private tuitions by private schools.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 provides for free and compulsory education, protection of children's rights, and the duty of the State Government to constitute a State Advisory Council. The court also noted the issuance of directions by the Director General of Education and the State Government to address various grievances raised by the petitioner.
Issues: The issues included arbitrary functioning of private schools, charging of exorbitant fees, compulsory purchases, increased transportation charges, and the compulsion of private tuitions by private schools.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of quality education and the State Government's duty to comply with the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The court also highlighted the duty of the State Government to constitute a State Advisory Council for the better management of the education system.
Final Decision: The petition was disposed of with no costs.
JUDGMENT
Ramesh Chandra Khulbe. J. - This letter petition (PIL) has been filed by Mr. Pankaj Khatri (President), Student Guardian Teacher Welfare Society Damuadunga, Sheeshmahal, Kathgodam, Haldwani, District Nainital) seeking the following relief: -
"To constitute a Complaint Center to deal with arbitrary functioning of the private schools of District Nainital, and further to direct the private schools to fix tuition fee and other charges after giving an opportunity to the representatives of parent teacher associations."
2. In the letter sent by the petitioner to this Court, it is stated therein that the private schools at Haldwani are charging exorbitant fee from the students and compelling the parents to purchase the stationery and school dress of their wards from a particular shop. It is also stated that the private schools have increased the transportation charges while in the school vans there are no security arrangements, and parents are compelled to drop their children to school by private vans or autorickshaw. The schools at Haldwani also compel the students to take private tuitions. It is further stated that the private schools cannot increase the fee without permission of the Government; no fee should be charged from the students for the continuous closure period of the schools; and the teachers should be paid the salary at least the minimum basic pay.
3. The Director General, School Education (Government of Uttarakhand), District Magistrate (Nainital), Central Board of Secondary Education (New Delhi) and Chief Education Officer (Nainital) were impleaded as respondents.
4. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no.1-Director General, School Education (Government of Uttarakhand), Dehradun, wherein, it is submitted that earlier, the Writ Petition (M/S) No.3302 of 2017, Sanyukt Vidhyalaya Prabhandan Saimiti Vs. State of Uttarakhand & others, and batch, were filed in which the following interim order was passed by this Court:-
"Till the next date of listing, the petitioners would make efforts as far as possible, to comply with the order dated 23.08.2017, but the petitioners shall not be coerced into it by the State or its authorities. I say this because whereas we all want the best books at reasonable price for the students, yet no one can be coerced into it. The subsequent orders dated 15.02.2018, 06.03.2018 and 09.03.2018, since prohibit any other books save NCERT books, are prima facie violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioners under Article 19 (1) (a) and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India, and to the extent these orders make this prohibition of books, these orders shall remain stayed. The petitioners, however, can make other books available to the students, but as far as possible, at competitive rates (i.e. in relation to price of NCERT books), as a genuine concern has been raised at the Bar by learned counsel for the State that the books published by the private publishers are unreasonably priced and in many cases, out of reach of students. These books, i.e. other than NCERT books, however, must meet the requirements and guidelines of CBSE curriculum and syllabus prescribed by the CBSE, and NCERT. The schools shall also publish this on their website."
5. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the office of Director General of Education, vide letter dated 24.09.2018, issued certain directions. A direction was also issued with regard to the fee structure on 02.03.2019. As regards providing security to the students is concerned, a direction was issued on 28.09.2018 for installation of CCTV cameras. Apart from that, certain other directions were also issued.
6. The other grievances raised by the petitioner that most of the teachers of private school of Haldwani are compelling the students for private tuition. In this regard, the Government has issued directions on 08.07.2011.
7. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
8. To provide for right