SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(UK) 218

N.S.DHANIK
Amit Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Neetu Singh, Advocate, Lalit Miglani, Advocate, Gaurav Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

N.S. Dhanik, J. - Present Criminal Miscellaneous Application, under Section 482 CrPC, has been preferred to quash and set aside the order dated 21.7.2018 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar in Misc. Case No. 1520 of 2018 filed under Section 156(3) CrPC as well as the judgment and order dated 29.1.2019 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar in Criminal Revision No. 521 of 2018.

2. Facts, in brief, are that the applicant filed an application under Section 156(3) CrPC before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar alleging that he had filed a complaint against the respondents 2 to 5 that they had made theft of stamp duty when they purchased a property in Haridwar and, on this complaint, the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Haridwar vide his order dated 5.3.2018 imposed penalty of rupees three lakhs on the said respondents for causing revenue loss to the State exchequer. Due to this, the said respondents nurtured enmity towards the applicant. At about 7.55 AM on 9.3.2018, the said respondents abused the applicant in the filthy language and when the applicant tried to stop them, the said respondents started be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top