SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(UK) 350

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Shagufta – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mohd Safdar, Advocate, Lalit Miglani, Advocate, Gaurav Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 567 of 2020, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC, Police Station Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

3. Fir in the instant case was lodged by respondent no.3, on 11th September, 2020. According to it, in order to show the victim of an offence as a minor, forged transfer certificate was prepared from a Madarsha Imam Hussain, village Jainpur Jhanjhedi (for short "the Madarasha") and the age of the victim was wrongly recorded. The petitioner was Principal of the Madarsha. This matter was reported and an inquiry was conducted thereafter, it was revealed that the documents were forged. Subsequent to it recommendations were made for revoking the recognition granted to the Madarsha. In the FIR, reference has been made to an inquiry report.

4. On behalf of respondent no.3, learned counsel would submit that in the inquiry it was found that there were no records of any of the students and the Madarsha was preparing records, the date of birth etc. as desired by the applicant(s) and during interrogation, the petitioner revealed during the inquiry

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top