IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Lok Pal Singh, J.
Charanjeet Kaur - Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand And Others - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 754 of 2020
Decided On : 12-10-2020
Suspension - Police Officer - Rule 17 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 - Summary of Rule 17 provided
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash the suspension order passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, PAC, Uttarakhand, on the grounds of being arbitrary and erroneous.
Finding of the Court:
The court disposed of the writ petition with the direction to the disciplinary authority to conclude the proceedings within four months.
Issues: Validity of the suspension order and the authority of the Deputy Inspector General of Police to pass the suspension order.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that suspension is not a punishment unless found to be arbitrary and punitive in nature. Cited the case of Union of India & another Vs. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal to support the position that courts should not normally interfere in suspension orders.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction to the disciplinary authority to conclude the proceedings within four months.
JUDGMENT
Lok Pal Singh, J. - Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following relief:-
i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for the records and quashing the impugned Suspension Order dated 14th July 2020 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, PAC, Uttarakhand, Dehradun, whereby the petitioner was suspended in contemplation of departmental disciplinary proceedings, being arbitrary and erroneous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the Rule 17 the SSP being the appointing authority could have place the petitioner under suspension, but the petitioner has been placed under suspension by the DIG. Rule 17 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 is quoted herein under:
17. Suspension-(1) (a) A Police Officer against whose conduct an enquiry is contemplated, or is proceedings, may be placed under suspension pending the conclusion of the enquiry in the discretion of the appointing authority or by any other authority not below the rank of Superintendent of Police, authorised by him in this behalf.
(b) A Police Officer in respect of or against whom an investigation, enquiry or trial relating to a criminal charge is pending may at the discretion of the appointing authority under whom he is serving be placed under suspension, until the termination of all proceedings relating to that charge, if the charge is connected with his position as a Police Officer or is likely to embarrass him in the discharge of his duties or involves moral turpitude. If the prosecution is instituted by a private person on complaint, the appointing authority may decide whether the circumstances of the case justify the suspension of the accused.
(2) A Police Officer shall be deemed to have been placed, or, as the case may be, continued to be placed, under suspension by an order of the appointing authority-
(a) with effect from the date of his detention if he is detained in custody whether the detention is on Criminal Charge or otherwise for a period exceeding forty eight hours ;
(b) with effect from the date of his conviction if in the event of a conviction for an offence he is sentenced to a term of imprisonment exceeding forty eight hours and is not forthwith dismissed or removed consequent to such conviction.
Explanation-The period of forty-eight hours referred to in Clause (b) of this sub-rule shall be computed from the commencement of the imprisonment after the conviction and for this purpose intermittent periods of imprisonment, if any, shall be taken into account.
(3) Where a penalty of dismissal or removal from service imposed upon a Police Officer is set aside in appeal or on review under these rules and the case is remitted for further inquiry or action or with any other directions-
(a) If he was under suspension immediately before the penalty was awarded to him, the order of his suspension shall, subject to any such directions as aforesaid, be deemed to have continued in force on and from the date of the original order of dismissal or removal ;
(b) If he was not under suspension, he shall, if so directed by the appellate or reviewing authority, be deemed to have been placed under suspension by an order of the appointing authority, on and from the date of the original order of dismissal or removal;
Provided that nothing in this sub-rule shall be construed as effecting the power of the competent authority, in a case where a penalty of dismissal or removal from service imposed upon a Police Officer is set aside in appeal or on review under these rules on grounds other than the merits of the allegations on which the said penalty was imposed but the case is not remitted for further inquiry or action or with any directions, to pass an order of suspension pending further inquiry against him on those allegations, so, however, that any such suspension shall not have retrospective effect.
(4) Where a penalty of dismissal or remo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.