JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 310 of 2020, under Sections 3, 5 & 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of the Uttarakhand Cow Progeny (Protection) Act, 2007, and Sections 188 and 336 IPC and Section 51 (b) of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

3. According to FIR, upon information having been received, that the petitioner and other co-accused are committing cow slaughtering, the police raided and recovered 180 Kg. beef and other instruments but at the time the petitioner and other co-accused managed to escape.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would argue that there is no evidence against the petitioner. According to FIR, while running they were calling each other by their names. It is also argued that there is no legally evidence as of now.

5. It is the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If the FIR discloses commission of offence, no interference is warranted. In the instant case, the FIR discloses commission of offence. Whether the petitioner is involved in it and if so to what extent? These are the mat