SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, ALOK KUMAR VERMA, JJ.
Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Shahi - Appellant
Versus
Board of Management and another - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 115 of 2021
Decided on : 12-04-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S.S. Yadav, adv
For the Respondents: Mr. Ramji Srivastava, adv

Point of Law: Employment and Service matter - Right to retain his lien on post of Associate Professor - Non Objection certificate issued by respondent - Whether Justified - Respondents are justified in claiming that due to dearth of faculty members, respondent no.1 had decided not to permit any faculty member to leave College in case he/she was applying for same post in another educational institution.

Headnote:

Employment - Post of Associate Professor - Eligible Criteria - Selection process - Whether petitioner can claim right to retain his lien on post of Associate Professor in College especially when he has been selected by JNU, or not - grievance of petitioner is that, although respondents had granted an NOC, they are not willing to grant leave without pay for one year to him so that he can join JNU - Hence, present writ petition before this Court.

Finding of the court: A bare perusal of NOC clearly reveals that, through NOC, respondents had merely stated that they have no objection if candidacy of petitioner were considered for post of Associate Professor in JNU - Through said NOC, they did not make any commitment that petitioner would be permitted to leave College, or that he will be permitted to retain his lien on post of Associate Professor in College - NOC merely permitted petitioner to undergo selection process initiated by JNU -Therefore, grant of NOC does not act as an estoppel against respondents.

Result; Writ Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, J.

Aggrieved by the order dated 22.02.2021 passed by the Board of Management, D.A.V. P.G. College (respondent no.1), the petitioner, Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Shahi, has approached this Court.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that in 2000 the petitioner was appointed as the Associate Professor (Geography) by the Board of Management, D.A.V. P.G. College, the respondent no. 1. Meanwhile, the Jawahar Lal Nehru University (for short the “JNU”) advertised a vacancy for the post of Associate Professor, in the Centre for Russian and Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies at the University. Since the petitioner was eligible for the said post, he sought the permission of respondent no. 1, and of the Principal, D.A.V. College, the respondent no. 2. On 05.08.2019, an NOC was issued in his favour. The petitioner went through the selection process with the JNU. On 11.11.2020, the JNU offered him appointment to the post of Associate Professor. The petitioner accepted the appointment offer by his letter dated 13.11.2020. By letter dated 16.11.2020, the Registrar (Academics), JNU directed the petitioner to join the Centre for Russian and Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies within a period of four months. The petitioner was also informed that, in case the JNU does not hear from him about his accepting the offer of appointment, it will be deemed that he is no longer interested.

3. The petitioner claims that while he is eager to join the Centre for Russian and Central Asian Studies, School of International Studies at JNU, he still wants to retain his lien over his post as an Associate Professor with respondent nos. 1 and 2. Therefore, on 18.11.2020, on 18.01.2021 and on 02.02.2021, he has repeatedly represented to respondent nos. 1 and 2 that they should permit him to take one year’s leave without pay, and permit him to join the JNU. Moreover, they should permit him to retain his lien on the post of Associate Professor with respondent nos. 1 and 2. By order dated 22.02.2021, the petitioner’s request, for issuing of the relieving order on the basis of the NOC issued by the competent authority, has been declined by respondent no. 1. The grievance of the petitioner is that, although the respondents had granted an NOC, they are not willing to grant leave without pay for one year to him so that he can join the JNU. Hence, the present writ petition before this Court.

4. Mr. S.S. Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioner, has raised the following contentions before this Court :

    Firstly, that on 26.12.2013, the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel & Training), Government of India had issued an Office Memorandum dealing with resignation, and lien to be retained by the government employees. Clause 1 of the said Office Memorandum defined the term “lien”. Clause 3 defined the term “lien on a post”. Clause (5) dealt with “retention of lien for appointment in another Central Government Department/Offices/State Government”. According to the learned counsel, “if a permanent employee is selected, on the basis of his application, for posts in other Central Government Department/Offices/State Government, his lien may be retained in the parent department for a period of two years. If the employee concerned is not permanently absorbed within a period of two years from the date of his appointment in the new post, he should immediately, on expiry of the period of two years, either resign from the service, or revert to his parent cadre. An undertaking to abide by this condition may be taken from him at the time of forwarding of his application to other departments/offices. The Office Memorandum dated 26.12.2013 has been reiterated in the Office Memorandum dated 27.08.2018 issued by the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, (Department of Personnel & Training), Government of India. Thus, according to the learned counsel, since

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top