IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Ravindra Maithani, J.
Km. Prachi (Female) and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Medical Health and Family Welfare and ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 523 of 2021
Decided On : 16-04-2021
Uttarakhand Recruitment to Services (Age Limit) Rules, 2004 - Rule-5 - Uttaranchal Subordinate Nursing (Non-Gazetted) Service Rules, 2015 - Service Commission (Procedure) Rules, 2003 - Post of Staff Nurse - Cutoff date for determining age has wrongly fixed - Re-fix as a Cutoff Date - To Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for record and quashing Clause-2 of notification issued, which fixes 01-01-2020 as cutoff date for determining minimum and maximum age of candidates, as it is against Rule-5 of Uttarakhand Recruitment to Services Rules, 2004 as amended from time to time - Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the candidature of petitioners suitable for being considered for selection/recruitment on post of Staff Nurse pursuant to notification/advertisement - Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case - Award cost of writ petition in favour of petitioner.
Finding of the Court : Court takes on record the statement of the learned Chief Standing Counsel - Learned Chief Standing Counsel also suggested a date, which the State Government intend to re-fix as a cutoff date, but it has been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners on the ground that the suggested cutoff date would further be in contravention of the Uttarakhand Recruitment of Service (Age Limit) Rules, 2004 (Rule 5). But, the learned Chief Standing Counsel would submit that the fresh cut off date will be in accordance with the Uttaranchal Subordinate Nursing Service Rules, 2015 - Learned Senior Counsel for respondent no. 5 would also submit that the suggestive date that the State Government intend to re-fix for determining the age will also be in accordance with the Uttaranchal Promotion by Selection in Consultation with Public Service Commission Rules, 2003 - This Court has no material as to which date the State Government intends to fix for determining the age, Court leaves this issue open - As and when such issue arises, parties are definitely free to agitate it before the State Government or before the respondent no. 5 - In view of statement given by learned Chief Standing Counsel, nothing survives in this writ petition.
Result : Petition disposed of
JUDGMENT :
By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs :-
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring the candidature of the petitioners suitable for being considered for selection/recruitment on the post of Staff Nurse pursuant to notification/advertisement dated 02-02-2021 and 09-02-2021.
(iii) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
(iv) Award the cost of the writ petition in favour of the petitioner.”
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing and perused the record.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that they are qualified for appointment to the post of Staff Nurse, but in the advertisement issued by the respondent no. 5, the cut off date for determining the age has been wrongly fixed; the date for determining the age is contrary to the Rules, which govern the field.
4. The matter was taken up yesterday, when the Court observed as hereunder:-
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that in the instant case, as per Rule 5 of the Rules, the date for computation of age should be 01.07.2021, because advertisement was published on 03.02.2021.
Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent no.5 would refer to a Government Order, which speaks that for the vacancies advertised in 2020, the date for computation would be 01.01.2020. But, the question in the instant case is that the vacancies were advertised on 03.02.2021 and it was so done while cancelling the earlier advertisement, which was published in the year 2020; In essence the process for recruitment is on, on the basis of advertisement dated 03.02.2021.
It is submitted that the examination is to be conducted on 18.04.2021.
The Court wanted to know from the learned Chief Standing Counsel, as well as the learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent no.5, as to how this lapse has been done both by the State Government as well as by the respondent no.5.
Learned Chief Standing Counsel seeks time to give response to the issue.
This is undoubtedly an urgent matter.
List this case on 16.04.2021 at 11:00 a.m. The Court expects that the concerned responsible officers in the State Government would sit together and discuss the issue. The matter may then be discussed with the respondent no.5 and a solution may be placed tomorrow, when the matter is taken up.”
5. Today, the learned Chief Standing Counsel would give the following statement:
(ii) The State Government has decided to re-fix the cut off date for determining the age.
(iii) The State Government/respondent no. 5, Uttarakhand Board of Technical Education will publish an amended advertisement and will give fifteen days’ time to the candidates to submit their applications, in accordance with the amended advertisement.
(iv) The candidates, who have already applied will not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.