JUDGMENT

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. - The petitioner of the present writ petition is a U.P. State Road Transport Corporation , as it then existed, which is a creation of the statute and it is a statutory body, and hence undisputed, it would be falling within a definition of an Industry , as it has been defined under the (from hereinafter referred to as the UPID Act ). Another fact, which particularly requires a reference at this stage itself, is that the respondent no.2/workman, herein, was working at the relevant point of time as Conductor , who was an employee of the petitioner s Organization and there exists, a master and servant relationship, which was a genuine relationship between them, which persisted to subsist till the taking of the impugned action.

2. The petitioner to the present writ petition, had preferred this writ petition challenging the impugned award, which was rendered by the learned Labour Court, Dehradun, in the Adjudication Case No.134/2000, by an award dated 12.02.2001. As a consequence thereto, the learned Labour Court while setting aside the order of the termination of services of the respondent no.2/workman, which was made vide order dated 26.11.1999, holding i