SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 58

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Chander – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajendra Dobhal, Advocate, R.C. Arya, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. - The petitioner has filed this writ petition praying for quashing of the order dated 04.07.2007, as well as the revisional courts order dated 25.03.2008, which has been passed by respondent nos.3 and 2, respectively to the writ petition.

2. The petitioner contends that he is beneficiary of an allotment which was made of Khasra No.170/2 having an area of 0.082 hectares in his favour, by virtue of a resolution passed by the Land Management Committee on 08.01.1997, in relation to a land, which was admittedly otherwise was vested with the Gaon Sabha and recorded in the revenue record as "Gohar". Subsequently before resorting to the allotment process, the revenue entries were altered and changed and land was recorded as "Banjar".

3. The petitioner later had filed an application, that since he being an allottee of the land, he may be granted benefit of Section 122-B(4)(f) of Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act. As a consequence of the aforesaid application, the matter was proceeded at the stage of Up Ziladhikari/Assistant Collector 1st Class, Laksar, who had proceeded to pass an order on 05.09.1997, directing to change the revenue entries from "Gohar" to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top