Uttam Sugar Mills Ltd vs Manoj Kumar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(UK) 66

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Uttam Sugar Mills Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Siddhant Manral, Advocate, Ashutosh Thakral, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. - These are the bunch of six writ petitions, which entails a consideration of common question of fact and law, hence, they are being decided together. To be precise, the particulars involved in each of the writ petitions are being given in the form of a schedule of chart herein below:-

Sr.No.	Writ Petition	Misc. Case	Post	Period	33 C(2) Filed	Amount Claimed
1.	1631 of 2019	20 of 2018	Fitter 2	02.11.2016 to 23.04.2017	33 C(2) filed on 22.03.2018	Rs.87,387/-
2.	1695 of 2019	19 of 2018	Fitter 2	29.11.2015 to 17.04.2016	33 C(2)	Rs.66,006/-
3.	1696 of 2019	36 of 2015	Secondary Fitter (Weighing)	09.12.2014 to 11.04.2015		Rs.63,175/-
4.	1760 of 2019	35 of 2015	Held Weighment Clerk	09.12.2014 to 11.04.2015	33C(2)15.10.2015	Rs. 62,321/-
5.	1762 of 2019	22 of 2018	Weighment Clerk	29.11.2015 to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(UK) 66

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMAUttam Sugar Mills Ltd – AppellantVersusManoj Kumar – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Uttam Sugar Mills Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar – Respondent