SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 156

LOK PAL SINGH
Sanjay Banal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.M. Pingal, Advocate, Subhash Tyagi Bhardwaj, Advocate, Shivani Gangwar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Lok Pal Singh, J. - This criminal revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.07.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun in Criminal Case No.1817 of 2010 "State Vs. Harimohan", whereby the revisionist/accused has been convicted under Sections 353, 332 and 504 of IPC, has been sentenced to undergo six months of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) under Section 353 of IPC, to undergo six months of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred Only) under Section 332 of IPC, and to undergo three months of rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred Only) under Section 504 of IPC. Against the order dated 11.07.2011, the revisionist filed an appeal before the Additional Sessions Judge, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun, which too has been dismissed vide order dated 28.06.2014.

2. Prosecution story, in brief, is that the first information report was lodged against the revisionist/accused under Sections 353, 332 and 504 of IPC, at Police Station Sahaspur, District Dehradun alleging that the revisionist/accused has used the abusive words again

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top