SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 113

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Lata Bisht – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Singh Bisht – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Siddhartah Sah, Advocate, Prabha Naithani, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - This revision is preferred against the judgment and order dated 30.10.2013, passed in Misc. Criminal Case No. 264 of 2011, Smt. Lata Bisht and another vs. Mohan Singh Bisht, by the court of learned Judge Family Court Nainital. By the impugned judgment and order an application filed under Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "the Code") filed by the revisionist has been allowed and the court directed the respondent to pay Rs. 7,000/- per month to the revisionists and out of which Rs. 5,000/- to the revisionist no.1 Smt. Lata Bisht and Rs. 2,000/- to revisionist no.2 Master Sharansh Bisht.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionists would raise only one point with regard to the child Sharansh Bisht, who is revisionist no.2. Learned counsel would submit that the amount of maintenance as awarded to the revisionist Sharansh Bisht is on the lower side and it may be enhanced to some higher side.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent would submit that respondent works in Delhi and get Rs. 17,000/- net salary. Out of which, Rs. 7,000/- is to be given to the revi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top