RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Akhlaq Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ravindra Maithani, J. - Instant revision is preferred against the impugned order dated 31.05.2016, passed in Case No. 59 of 2015, under Sections 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, "the Code"), Smt. Shami Farzana vs. Israr Hussain, by the court of learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Pithoragarh (for short "the case"). By the impugned order, a notice issued under Section 145 of the Code dated 07.06.2012 was withdrawn, but subsequent to it, directions were issued that the tenant shall give rent to both the parties equally, which is impugned herein.
2. It appears that a premises was given on rent by the revisionist to an Engineering College and a hostel runs in that premises (hereinafter referred to as "the rented premises"). Some dispute arose between the parties. Private respondent no.2 Smt. Shami Farzana filed an application before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Pithorogarh with the averments that she is owner of the rented premises, but the rent is not being paid to her. The impugned order records that the rented premises was purchased jointly by the revisionist and Late Jakir Hussain, who was husband of respondent no. 2 Smt. Shami Farzana. This was made
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.