2020 Supreme(UK) 412
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Lok Pal Singh, J.
Yukti Constructions Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondent
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 93 of 2014
Decided On : 21-12-2020
Aditya Singh, Advocate, J.P. Joshi, Advocate, Anjali Bhargava, Advocate, Sushil Vashishtha, Advocate
Headnote:
Writ Jurisdiction – It is settled position in law that where question of facts are involved – And such disputed questions are of complex nature which require elaborate evidences etc. – Such writ petitions may not be appropriately tried under the writ jurisdiction. (Paras 39 to 50)
fjV vf/kdkfjrk & ;g LFkkfir fof/k fLFkfr gS fd tc rF;ksa ds iz'u dk lacaèk gks vkSj dfFkr fookfnr iz'uksa dh izÑfr tfVy gks] ftlds fy, foLr`r lk{;ksa dh vko';drk gks & rc dfFkr fjV ;kfpdk ij mi;qDrrk ls fjV vf/kdkfjrk ds varxZr fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA ¼izLrj 39 ls 50½
JUDGMENT
Lok Pal Singh, J. - By means of present writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:-
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act issued on 21.09.1987 and 30.01.1988 (Annexure P-1).
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the orders of the Collector/District Magistrate, Dehradun dated 11.03.2013 and 22.04.2013 (Annexure nos.17 and 16 respectively to this writ petition).
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from plots bearing Khewat No.1 and Khasras included in it situated in Village Rikholi, Pargana Pachwadun, Tehsil and District Dehradun, having total area of 187.4890 hectares equivalent to 491 acres.
(iv) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice;
(v) Award cost of petition to the petitioner.
2. Factual matrix of the case is that vide Notification dated 21.09.1987 issued under Section 4(1) read with sections 17(1) and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act), the respondents proposed to acquire 172.91 acres of land situated at Park Estate, Pargana Pachwadun, Mussoorie, for a public purpose, namely, for the development of tourist activity in district Dehradun. Since the land was alleged to have been urgently required by the respondents/State, the provision of Section 17(1) of the Act was invoked and the inquiry under Section 5-A of the Act was dispensed with. Thereafter, declaration under Section 6 r/w Section 17(1) and (4) of the Act was made on 30.01.1988. On 19.02.1991, respondent no.2 the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Dehradun passed an award.
3. The petitioner claims to be owner and recorded tenure holder of the aforesaid land and contends that it has purchased plots bearing Khewat (esrstwhile khasra no.1) khasra nos.1298 to 1331 situated in Village Rikholi, Pargana Pachwadun, Tehsil and District Dehradun, having total area of 187.4890 .hectares equivalent to 491 acres, through various sale deeds, from M/S U.B. Engineers, Arun Dev City Space and four others original proprietors i.e. Dinesh Singh, Harish Kumar Sehgal, Lalit Kumar Sehgal and Bhanu Pratap, all of who collectively and individually were proprietors of and in possession of the total area of 491 acres purchased by the petitioner. Petitioner contends that the villagers/tenure holders of Village Rikholi had executed sale deeds in favour of M/s U.B. Engineers on 06.10.1997 admeasuring 1000 bighas and on 30.12.1997 admeasuring 1000 bighas. It is also stated that in this regard there is a report of the Lekhpal of Village Rikholi dated 09.11.2000 which shows that M/s U.B. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. had purchased the land of Village Rikholi and the possession of the same had been transferred to U.B. Engineers, whereupon an order was passed by the Tehsildar on 09.11.2000 for the mutation of the name of M/s U.B. Engineers in the revenue records. It is also stated that by virtue of registered sale deeds dated 11.01.2007, 25.09.2009, 25.11.2009, 11.01.2010, 05.11.2009 and 06.08.2010 executed by the aforesaid recorded owners, the petitioner became the owner and in possession of the land in dispute.
4. Petitioner moved application for mutation of its name on the basis of sale deed dated 24.01.2007, whereupon the Lekhpal physically verified the land status and submitted a report. The collector Dehradun, on the basis of report, passed an order dated 24.06.2008, after due publication of notice inviting objections under Section 39 of the Land Revenue Act, for mutation of the name of the petitioner in the revenue record over the land in question. Subsequently, petitioner moved an application for demarcation of its entire land under Secti