SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 26

ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Gajendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. D.N. Sharma.
For the Respondent: Mr. T.C. Agarwal, by Mr. Pankaj Joshi

JUDGMENT :

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

This bail application has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in connection with FIR No.0178 of 2019, registered with Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 &, 471 of I.P.C.

2. An FIR was lodged by the informant Manish Tejwani on 25.05.2019 against the present applicant alleging that he had purchased the property-in-question from the present applicant through registered sale deed dated 16.08.2017 for Rs.25.00 lakhs. When he went for mutation, he came to know that there was no land in the name of the applicant in the property-in-question. He alleged that the applicant made false documents with intent to commit fraud.

3. Heard Mr. D.N. Sharma, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. T.C. Agarwal, the learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Pankaj Joshi, the learned Brief Holder for the State through video conferencing.

4. Mr. D.N. Sharma, the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has not committed any offence; he has been implicated; he was the owner of the land-in-question at the time of the s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top