IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
RAVINDRA MAITHANI, J.
State of Uttarakhand - Appellant
Versus
Abid Ali @ Asad Ali @ Ajit Singh @ Abu Bakar - Respondent
Government Appeal No. 33 of 2014
Decided on : 22-09-2021
Penal code, 1860 - Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471 & 120B - Foreigners Act, 1946- Section 14- Passports Act, 1967- Section 12 (1A)(a)- Representation of the People Act, 1950- Section 31 - Punishment of criminal conspiracy- Communications with foreign agents to be evidence of commission of certain offences.
Finding of the Court:
Court is of the view that the prosecution has been able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused gave false information in the affidavit Ex. A97, dated 08.05.2008 in support of his passport application. The prosecution has been able to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that the accused is a foreigner. The accused did not adduce any evidence that he is a resident of Village Bhattawala, Police Station Bhattawala, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. He even did not clarify as to when did he come to Meerut (in the year 1993, as claimed by him (Ex. A-105), or in the year 2000-2001, as claimed by LIU, Meerut Ex. A88). The accused did not examine any witness from Village Bhattawala. He did not examine his parents, his brothers and sisters, if any, staying in Village Bhattawala or in any other place in India. He did not examine any of his blood relatives. He examined DW2 Sahista, his wife and DW1 Afsari his mother-in-law, but both did not know much about the accused. They did not know his parents. The accused did not introduce them to his parents. The accused did not discharge onus that he is not a foreigner
Result: Appeal partly allowed
JUDGMENT :
Instant Government Appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 22.07.2013, passed in Jail Appeal No. 7 of 2013, Asad Ali Vs. State of Uttarakhand, by the court of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Haridwar (for short, “the appeal”). By the impugned judgment and order, the conviction and sentence of the respondent Abid Ali @ Asad Ali @ Abu Bakar @ Ajeet Singh (hereinafter referred to as “the accused”), under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471 & 120B IPC, Section 14 Foreigners Act, 1946 (for short, “the Foreigners Act”), Section 12 (1A)(a) of the Passports Act, 1967 (for short, “the Passports Act”), Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 (for short, “the Official Secrets Act”) and Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 recorded on 19.12.2012, in Criminal Case No. 2596 of 2010, State Vs. Abid Ali @ Asad Ali @ Ajeet Singh @ Abu Bakar by the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haridwar (for short, “the case”), has been set aside and the accused has been acquitted of the charges. In the case, the accused has also been convicted of the charge under Sections 4 & 9 of the Official Secrets Act, but the accused was not sentenced thereunder. In appeal, no order has been passed about the charge under Sections 4 & 9 of the Official Secrets Act.
2. Facts necessary for the disposal of the instant appeal, briefly stated, are as hereunder:-
(ii) According to the accused, he was operating under the instructions of Major Rathore. He was getting information relating to military movements of Meerut, Roorkee, Dehradun and Bikaner. He would receive money through Western Union Money Transf
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.