RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Uttarakhand Waqf Board – Appellant
Versus
Mausin – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, namely, Mr. T.A. Khan, the learned Senior Counsel for the appellants, Mr. Rajendra Singh Azad, the learned counsel for the private respondent, Mr. Mausin and, Mr. Nagesh Aggarwal, the learned counsel for respondent no.2, the Nagar Panchayat, Piran Kaliyar, this appeal is being decided at this stage itself.
2. The appellants have challenged the legality of the order dated 26.03.2021, passed by a learned Single Judge, in Writ Petition (M/S) No.773 of 2021, whereby the learned Single Judge had allowed the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner, Mr. Mausin, and had set-aside the advertisement dated 19.03.2021 issued by the Waqf Board.
3. For the sake and convenience, the parties shall be referred to as arrayed in the writ petition.
4. Briefly the facts of the case are that the petitioner, Mr. Mausin, claimed to be an Elected Ward Member of Ward No.2, Nagar Panchayat Piran Kaliyar. In order to safeguard the interest of the Nagar Panchayat, he had filed the writ petition, wherein he had challenged the advertisement dated 19.03.2021, issued by the Manager, Dargah
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.