JUDGMENT :

A revenue suit being Revenue Suit No. 22/1067 of 2008-09 ‘Deepak Tiwari vs. Dinesh Chandra and Others’ was filed by the plaintiff (respondent no. 1 herein) seeking a declaration by invoking the provisions contained under Section 229B of the Zamindari Abolition Act. At the time when the Suit itself was instituted by the plaintiffs, i.e. as back as on 29.06.2009, in relation to the property, which was more particularly described in relief clause of the plaint, which constituted to be Khet No. 622-gha having an area of 0.231 hectares, it was sought to be declared as to be a bhumidhar land lying under Shreni 1. When the said Suit was instituted, it was as against as many as about 16 defendants to the Suit, but the petitioner who claims himself to be the purchaser of the property in dispute, which was a subject matter of the aforesaid Suit, even much prior in time, i.e. on 23.07.2002 by virtue of a registered sale deed was not impleaded as a party to the proceedings of the Suit under Section 229B, i.e. Revenue Suit No. 22/1067 of 2008-09.

2. The petitioner contends that there was apparent malafides in relation to the manner of institution of the Suit itself, because for the rea