SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 428

MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Jugpal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajveer Singh, Advocate, S.S. Chauhan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. - According to the petitioner, there are some fruit bearing trees and other trees standing over his agricultural land, however, the private respondents are trying to cut those trees without any authority of law.

2. In the relief clause, petitioner has sought a direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Roorkee, District Haridwar to take decision on petitioner's application filed under Section 41 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901.

3. Since petitioner has made application under Section 41 of U.P. Land Revenue Act only on 10.12.2021, therefore, no direction can be issued to the Competent Authority to decide petitioner's application in a time bound manner.

4. Accordingly, writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. However, since petitioner's application is pending, this Court hopes and expects that the Competent Authority shall decide his application, in accordance with law, as early as possible.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top