SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 479

MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
Manish Sehgal – Appellant
Versus
Excise Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sandeep Kothari, Advocate, Pradeep Hairiya, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. - Petitioner was granted license for retail sale of Country Liquor at a particular location. Now, District Magistrate, Dehradun has asked the petitioner to shift his shop to some other location vide order dated 30.11.2021. Feeling aggrieved by District Magistrate’s order, petitioner has approached this Court.

2. Since petitioner has a remedy to file Appeal under Section 11(1) of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has made a representation to Excise Commissioner on 10.12.2021, which may be treated as Appeal.

4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if petitioner’s representation is directed to be treated as Appeal.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Excise Commissioner to consider and decide petitioner’s Appeal, in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of three weeks’ from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is further provided that if petitioner makes an application seeking stay of District Magistrate’s order within 24 hours, Excise Commissioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top