JUDGMENT

Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ. - The petitioners have challenged the legality of the order, dated 05.07.2021, passed by a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (M/S) No.1857 of 2018, whereby relying on the undertaking given by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.3 and 4, an undertaking not contested by the petitioners, the learned Single Judge had disposed of the writ petition as under:-

"Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by taking the statement made by Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, learned Senior Advocate on record. However, it is made clear that fee, if determined in excess of what is indicated above, then petitioners shall be at liberty to challenge such fee determination. Petitioners shall also be at liberty to move appropriate application in WPMS No. 933 of 2018".

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the petitioners had qualified the examination of NEET-under graduate-2017. The State of Uttarakhand, and the H.N.B. Uttarakhand Medical Education University, the respondent Nos.1 and 2 respectively, had issued a bulletin for centralized counseling which was to commence from 16.07.2017. The choices were to be given between 16.07.2017 to 21.07.2